02.04.2026 Court No.28 Item No.61 tbsr Allowed CRM (A) 693 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gangarampur P.S. Case No.36 of 2026 dated 25.01.2026 under Sections 109(1)/117(2)/3(5)/351(2)/85 of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Obaidul Miah ….Petitioner. Mr. Kaushik Choudhury Mr. Dwaipan Panda Mr. Tridib Das ….for the petitioner Mr. Imran Ali Mr. Karan Bapuli .. for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner is the husband of the de facto complainant. All and sundry in the in-laws’ place have been arrayed as accused in the FIR. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the statements of witnesses including that of the victim. However, he submits that there is no injury report present in the case diary. Considering the above and the other materials available in the case diary, I do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case and I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting 2 Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with investigation, shall meet the I.O. once a week till submission of report in final form and shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for. (Jay Sengupta, J.)