MAHAMAYA SELF HELP GROUP - TAPARKELA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/1143/2026 · 2026-03-16
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9088 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9088 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:12664
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1143 of 2026 Mahamaya Self Help Group - Taparkela Through President Smt. Pushpa Singh W/o Krishna Singh Aged About 50 Years President Of Mahamaya Self Help Group Taparkela R/o Village Taparkela Block Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector, Surguja (Ambikapur), District- Surguja (C.G.) 3 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) 4 - The Block Education Officer, Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) 5 - President Of Asha Self Help Group Taparkela Block Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. AN Pandey, Advocate For Respondents 1 to 4/State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Govt. Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Order on Board 17.3.2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside of impugned order dated 16.2.2026 (Annexure P/1) issued by respondent No.4. BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.03.19 10:23:59 +0530
2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record in this case. 10.3 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without providing opportunity of hearing, impugned order dated 16.02.2026 (Annexure-P/1) has been passed by respondent No.4 and the petitioner/society has been deprived of carrying out the work of preparation of mid-day meals at Govt. Primary School Taperkela and Govt. Middle School Taparkela. Hence, it is prayed that this petition may be admitted for hearing.
3. In reply, learned counsel for respondents 1 to 4/State submits that on account of resolutions passed by the Gram Panchayat and approved by Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Ambikapur, petitioner has been discontinued from preparation of mid-day meals at Govt. Primary School, Taperkela and Govt. Middle School Taparkela and the same has been handed over to respondent No.5.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available record.
5. The petitioner has annexed scheme of preparation or mid-day meals as Annexure-P/4, which shows that against the impugned order, the petitioner may file representation before concerned Collector, therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition invoking extra ordinary jurisdictions of this Court. Hence, the same is dismissed. However, liberty is left with the petitioner to raise their grievance before the Collector, Surguja (Ambikapur). In the eventuality of filing such representation by the petitioner, the Collector, Suguja (Ambikapur) is directed to consider and decide the same in
3 accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the representation.
6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.
7. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini