HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9993 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicant and Learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.180 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 333, 115(2), 351(3), 352 and 324(4) BNS, Police Station- Dankaur, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the abovementioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the FIR has been lodged against three named accused and some unknown persons. The allegation is of the applicant and the other accused barging into the workshop of the informant and assaulting his nephew, Neeraj. The injured, Neeraj, is said to have received only two visible injuries and none of the injuries were found to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. 4. Relying upon the supplementary report prepared by CHC, Kasna, District, Gautam Buddh Nagar, the Learned counsel for the applicant contends that after NCCT, head scan, X-ray chest and X-rays of left and right shoulder, the doctor has opined that the injuries were simple in nature. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The similarly situated co-accused Pradeep Sharma has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in NABAIL No.9346 of 2026. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Prince Sharma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not point out any criminal antecedents of the applicant. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties. 7. No specific role has been assigned to the applicant. None of the injuries have been opined to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. The injured is said to have received only two injuries. From the perusal of the FIR, the mode and manner of assault, the number of accused nominated in the FIR, in the opinion of the Court, the possibility of applicant being falsely implicated cannot be ruled out. Similarly situated co-accused Pradeep Sharma has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. 8. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge applicant on anticipatory bail. 9. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 10. In the event of the arrest of the applicant-Prince Sharma, he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; NABAIL No. 9993 of 2026 2 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 12. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 24, 2026 A. Pandey NABAIL No. 9993 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad