Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010131192026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1738/2026 PARAG JYOTI DEKA S/O BHUBANESWAR DEKA, R/O BAELESSAKONA VILLAGE, PO AND PS RANGIA, DIST KAMRUP , ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM, GUWAHATI Advocate for the Petitioner : S KAUR, R R BAISHYA,L BANIK,N NEOG Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 25 .06. 2026 Heard Ms. S. Kaur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent. 2. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner namely, Parag Jyoti Deka under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking regular bail in connection with Sarthebari P.S. Case No. 41/2026
Page No.# 2/3 registered under Section 310(4) of the BNS, 2023. 3. Case diary as called for is received and perused. 4. The allegation as reflected in the FIR is that the petitioner in conspiracy with the other co-accused persons had made preparation to commit decoity in the house of the informant. 5. The petitioner was arrested on 03.06.2026 and forwarded on the next date and since then he has been behind the bars. 6. It appears that the petitioner is not named accused in the FIR and he has been arrested on the statement of the co-accused, which cannot be considered for denial of bail. 7. It appears from the case diary that no materials in the form of any weapons etc. were recovered, which would indicate preparation for committing decoity and other than the own statements of the accused persons, there appears to be no sufficient material pointing towards any steps taken by the petitioner for commission of the alleged offence. 8. Having regard to the above and the period of detention already undergone by the petitioner, further detention of the petitioner is not considered necessary. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. 9. The petitioner named above shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Eleka Magistrate in connection with the aforementioned case. 10.
The direction for bail is further subject to the following conditions that: (i) the petitioner shall appear before the trial court regularly and he
Page No.# 3/3 shall cooperate with the investigation; (ii) the petitioner shall not try to influence or intimidate any person or the remaining witnesses, who are acquainted with the facts of the case, in any manner. 11. The bail application accordingly stands disposed of. 12. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant