VIJAY SEHGAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH MR SANJEEV KUMAR ASSIT ENGINEER BLDG
CONT.CAS(C)/858/2026 · 2026-05-13
Sachin Datta
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9081 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9081 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026
$~117 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 +
VIJAY SEHGAL
.....Petitioner CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026 and CM APPL.32328/2026 Through: Mr. Satvik Tiparti, Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH MR
SANJEEV KUMAR ASSIT ENGINEER BLDG .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Manoj K. Sharma, Adv. for MCD
Mr. Vikash Chopra, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.32327/2026 (Exemption)
2. The application stands disposed of.
3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 14.05.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 6385/2025. The operative directions therein are as under:- CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026 Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:19:43 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026
4. At the outset, learned counsel for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) who appears on advance notice, submits that the petitioner’s application for de-sealing of the property is under consideration. He submits that the MCD is also required to verify and examine the sanctioned building plan in respect of the property in question and compare the same with the existing construction presently standing at the property.
5. He further submits that if no impediment is found upon conclusion of the aforesaid exercise currently being undertaken by the MCD, the petitioner’s Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:19:43 Signature Not Verified
CONT.CAS(C) 858/2026
application will be duly considered and an appropriate order shall be passed under intimation to the petitioner.
6. In the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition at this stage. The same is consequently disposed of along with pending application.
7. The MCD is directed to conclude the aforesaid exercise as expeditiously as possible.
8. If the petitioner is aggrieved with the outcome of the aforesaid exercise, he shall be at liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies.
MAY 13, 2026/uk
SACHIN DATTA, J Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:18.05.2026 10:19:43