IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13869 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2025 Thana- PRATAPGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Rishav Jha @ Rishav Kumar @ Shravan Kumar S/o Digamber Jha R/o Village - Govindpur (ward no.-2), P.S - Pratapganj, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Pratapganj P.S. Case No. 207 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 37, 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have caught hold the informant and co-accused Pintu Ram is alleged to have fired upon the informant, which hit the waist of the informant and he became unconscious and fell on the ground. Thereafter, the informant was taken to the PHC, Pratapganj for treatment. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13869 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/2 this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not alleged to have fired upon the informant nor is he alleged to be holding any lethal weapon. It is also submitted that the petitioner has four criminal antecedents and is in custody since 28.09.2025. It is lastly submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering with the evidence. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Supaul, in connection with Pratapganj P.S. Case No. 207 of 2025. 7. The application stands allowed. 8. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence, the prosecution may take steps for cancellation of bail-bonds of the petitioner. Jyoti/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T