Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9069 (RAJ)

HIMANSHU S/O FATEHLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8950/2026 · 2026-07-02

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24474] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8950/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16429U / 2026 Himanshu S/o Fatehlal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Khatik Mohalla Bijoliya, Police Station Bijoliya, District Bhilwara (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aayush Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 8/2025 registered at Police Station Borada, District Kekri for the offences under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offence under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. It is further contended that the petitioner was not aware that the co-accused Shubham was carrying 20.240 kg of poppy straw in the vehicle owned by petitioner and the other co-accused Shubham and Rakesh have alreay been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench. The quantity of poppy straw recovered from other co-accused is below [2026:RJ-JP:24474] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8950/2026] commercial quantity. The petitioner is in custody since long and further trial of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that petitioner is in custody since long and further trial of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Himanshu S/o Fatehlal in connection with FIR No. 8/2025 registered at Police Station Borada, District Kekri shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 59/CHETNA BEHRANI