MAYA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/22169/2026 · 2026-09-22
Vivek Saran
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22169 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition with regard to petitioner nos.2, 3 and 4.
2. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed insofar as petitioner nos.2, 3 and 4 are concerned.
3. Hence, the petition proceeds with regard to petitioner no.1 only.
4. Pursuant to the last order passed in the present petitioner, learned Standing Counsel has furnished written instructions (non-dated) under the signatures of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Manjhanpur, Kaushambi, the same are taken on record.
5. The instant petition has been filed with the following relief:
"I) A writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the respondent no.4 to decide the Case under Section 76 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously within stipulated period as fixed by the Hon'ble High Court."
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner as such submits that the application dated 15.05.2025 filed by the petitioner no.1, Maya Devi, be directed to be decided within some time bound manner.
7. Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents does not have any objection to the above prayer.
8. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Yadava, Sanju Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Maya Devi And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondent no.3/Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Manjhanpur, District Kaushambi to decide the application of the petitioner dated 15.05.2025 within a period of six months of production of certified copy of this order alongwith the self attested copy of the writ petition subject to there being any legal impediment after hearing all the concerned parties.
9. It is however provided that dismissal of the writ petition against petitioner nos.2, 3 and 4 will not prevent the respondents from taking any legal action as available under law. September 23, 2026 Deepika WRIC No. 22169 of 2026 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad