M/S SUMEER AND COMPANY LSM AND ANOTHER v. DEEP RAM AND ANOTHER
CMP.M/172/2026 · 2026-05-15
Sushil Kukreja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9067 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9067 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
M/s Sumeer & Company & Anr. Vs. Deep Ram & Anr.
CMP(M) No. 172/2026 15.05.2026 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants. Respondent No. 1 ex parte. Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, for respondent No. 2.
CMP(M) No. 172/2026 No reply to the application is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicant/respondent No. 2. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of applicant Surinder Kumar, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of 71 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay of 71 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of.
FAO No.
/2026 Appeal be registered. Notice. Mr. Bhupinder Pathania, Advocate, accepts service of notice on behalf of respondent No. 2. Let notice be issued to respondent No. 1 returnable for
25.05.2026.
….2…. As prayed, list for hearing on admission on
25.05.2026. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 15th May, 2026 (raman)