Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9064 (UTT)

PRAYAG SINGH v. TEHSILDAR SITARGANJ DISTRICT UDHAM SINGH NAGAR

WPMS/1963/2020 · 2026-07-29

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010106992020 2026:UHC:6559 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1963/2020 Prayag Singh --Petitioner Versus Tehsildar, Sitarganj & Others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. None for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State. (2) Petitioner took agriculture loan of rupees five lakhs from SBI, Nanakmatta on 1.12.2015. Since there was default on the part of the petitioner in repaying the loan, therefore, recovery citation was issued against the petitioner. In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the recovery citation, issued by Tehsildar, Sitargant on 21.9.2020 (3) Order sheet indicates that writ petition came up for preliminary hearing before coordinate Bench on 21.10.2020. Petitioner was directed to remove defects. Defects have not been removed so far. (4) Learned State Counsel points out that recovery must have been made by now. Even otherwise also, since petitioner took loan under a State Sponsored Scheme, therefore, the bank was justified in issuing recovery certificate. Thus there is no scope for interference. Writ petition fails and is dismissed. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 29.7.2026 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C9195 7BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.07.29 17:03:04 +05'30' UKHC010106992020 2026:UHC:6559