DROPA D/O BHAGWAN SINGH W/O ARJUN SINGH, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/984/2026 · 2026-06-29
Anil Kumar Upman
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9063 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9063 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:23794] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 984/2026 URN: CRLW / 3936U / 2026
1. Dropa D/o Bhagwan Singh W/o Arjun Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
2. Arjun Singh S/o Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor.
2. Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur.
3. SHO, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur.
4. SHO, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Bharatpur.
5. Kuldeep @ Kuli S/o Prakash, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
6. Deepu S/o Kali, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
7. Pawan S/o Late Bhagwan Singh, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
8. Kunwar Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
9. Bhuri W/o Bhagwan Singh, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
10. Madan S/o Mohan Singh, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
11. Mohan Singh S/o Sukhdev, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
12. Krishan S/o Dharambeer, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
13. Savita @ Papu W/o Kuldeep @ Kuli, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
14. Sunil S/o Dharambeer, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
15. Ajmit W/o Chandrapal, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
16. Jagat Singh S/o Gulab, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
[2026:RJ-JP:23794] (2 of 3) [CRLW-984/2026]
17. Ghure S/o Hari Singh, R/o Rundh Ikran, District Bharatpur.
18. Manoj S/o Unknown, R/o VPO Kharaira, Police Station Uchchain, District Bharatpur.
19. Badal S/o Raghuveer, R/o Village Badi, District Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagmohan Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 29/06/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled.
2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 19 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Shiv Sanatan Vivah Mandir Trust (Regd.), Plot No.155B, Ground Floor, Qutab Vihar, Goyala Dairy, Phase-1, Dwarka, (Near Sector 19-B), New Delhi on 15.06.2026. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 19 are not happy with their
[2026:RJ-JP:23794] (3 of 3) [CRLW-984/2026] marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3- The Station House Officer, Police Station Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.) and respondent No.3 is
directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J 300/LALIT MOHAN