1 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1006 of 2026 Dated 01.09.2026 APHC010453042026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1006/2026 Between: DODDIGARLA VENKATA LAKSHMI, W/O. MUNESWARA RAO,AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE,R/O. D.NO.13-123, REDDAMMA STREET,VIDYANAGAR, ELURU, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its SPL Public Prosecutor,High Court of AP.Through Inspector of Police,Anti-Corruption Bureau, Eluru Range,Eluru, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: BHASKAR PREM KOUSHIK Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1006 of 2026 Dated 01.09.2026 The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, ‘the BNSS’), challenging the order dated 03.06.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.120 of 2026 in Crl.M.P.No.304 of 2025 in C.C.No.06 of 2024 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Rajamahendravaram, whereby and whereunder the application filed under Sections 59, 60, 74 and 76 of ‘the BNSS’, seeking permission to mark copies of the Annual Property Statements of the Accused Officer and the connected official communications as secondary evidence on her behalf, was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. The impugned order dated 03.06.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.120 of 2026 in Crl.M.P.No.304 of 2025 in C.C.No.06 of 2024 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Rajamahendravaram, is purely interlocutory in nature. In view of the bar contained under Section 397(2) of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’/Section 438(2) of ‘the BNSS’, and in view of the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1006 of 2026 Dated 01.09.2026 Sethuraman v. Rajamanickam1, Bhaskar Industries Ltd. v. Bhiwani Denim & Apparels Ltd.2, Girish Kumar Suneja v. CBI3 and Amar Nath v. State of Haryana4, the present Criminal Revision Case is not maintainable. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appropriate application, in accordance with law, to redress her grievance. 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 01.09.2026 RSI 1(2009) 5 SCC 153 2(2001) 7 SCC 401 3(2017) 14 SCC 809 4(1977) 4 SCC 137 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.1006 of 2026 Dated 01.09.2026 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1006 of 2026 Dated: 01.09.2026 RSI 44