Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010410152026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 22318/2026 Between:
1. A SUGUNA, W/O K KAMESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O R/O 12709, SKYLINE DRIVE, PLAIN FIELD IL 60585, USA, REP.BY HER BROTHER AND G.P.A. HOLDER A YUGUANDHAR S/O DORASWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O VENKATA RAMAPURAM VILLAGE
RAMACHANDRA PURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. P MURALIDHAR NAIDU, S/O SRINIVASULA NAIDU, AGED AOUT 72 YEARS R/O CHOWDEPALLE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP. BY SON/GPA HOLDER P SRINIVASULA NAIDU, S/O MURALIDHAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O D.NO.27-58-12-1, GOKUL CIRCLE STREET, MURALI HOSPITAL ROAD, PUNGANURU, ANNMAYYA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. THE JOINT COLLECOTR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE THASILDAR, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the physical applications/representations made by the petitioners for deletion of their lands in Sy.No. 140/3 to an extent of Ac.3-00 Cts Koramenigunta H/o Akkarampalle Village, Tirupati urban Mandal, Tirupati District, after subdividing the land, as arbitrary, illegal, in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the physical applications/ representations made by the petitioners for deletion of their lands in Sy.No. 140/3 to an extent of Ac.3.00 Cts Koramenigunta H/o Akkarampalle Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal,
Tirupati District, subdividing the land in light of G.O.Ms.No.444 Revenue (Registration-1) Department dated 22- 07-2026 IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Direct the Respondents to consider the physical applications/representations made by the petitioners for deletion of their lands in Sy.No. 140/3 to an extent of Ac.3.00 Cts Koramenigunta H/o Akkarampalle Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal.
Tirupati District, subdividing the land in light of G.O.Ms.No.444 Revenue (Registration-!) Department dated 22-07-2026, by sub dividing the land pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.22318 OF 2026 ORDER:
1. The present writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondent authorities in not considering the application submitted by the petitioners. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have purchased land admeasuring Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.140/3. It is submitted that the said property was initially classified as “Tank Poramboke” vide proceedings dated 04.02.1987 issued by the Settlement Officer, Nellore, and the petitioners were found to be in encroachment of the said poramboke land. 3. The respondents preferred an appeal before the Special Officer, and the same was dismissed vide order dated 13.03.2000. Thereafter, the petitioners filed W.P.No.10988 of 2002 and batch, seeking mutation of their names in the revenue records. The State also filed W.P.No.12928 of 2002. The writ petition filed by the petitioners was allowed and the writ petition filed by the State was dismissed. The writ appeals preferred by the State were also dismissed. Thereafter, S.L.P.Nos.8585-8587 of 2003, preferred by the State, were dismissed on 09.10.2003. 4. Unmindful of the aforesaid proceedings, respondent No.2, vide proceedings dated 24.10.2002, and in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.26623 of 2001, directed implementation of the orders of the Settlement Officer, Nellore, dated 04.02.1987 in the
revenue records, subject to the outcome of the S.L.P. It is submitted that the said S.L.P. was also dismissed on 09.10.2003. 5. However, the respondents continued to retain the subject property in the prohibited list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act. In this regard, the petitioners submitted several representations requesting sub-division of the property and deletion of the extent of Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.140/3 of Akkarampalle Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal, from the original pattadar, P. Rukminamma, and also for deletion of the said extent of Ac.3.00 cents from the prohibited list maintained under Section 22-A. It is submitted that no orders have been passed despite several representations submitted by the petitioners. 6. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents seeks time to obtain instructions. 7.
Having considered the orders passed by the Settlement Officer dated 04.02.1987, the subsequent orders passed by the Special Commissioner and Director of Settlements dated 13.03.2000, the orders passed by the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration dated 15.07.2000, the orders passed in W.P.No.10988 of 2002 and batch dated 23.04.2002, the common order dated 25.09.2002 passed in W.A.No.1443 of 2002 and the orders passed in S.L.P.Nos.8585-8587 of 2003 dated 09.10.2003, the case of the petitioners deserves to be considered by the respondents by passing appropriate orders, duly
taking into consideration the aforesaid proceedings and the judicial pronouncements rendered by the Courts. 8. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed off. The respondents are directed to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, duly taking into consideration the proceedings of the Settlement Officer dated 04.02.1987, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM
212 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION No.22318 of 2026 Date: 24.08.2026
KGM