HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32610 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Mohd. Nasim Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant hands up the supplementary affidavit in support of the bail application. The same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Ahmad & Sri Saziya Praveen, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 1B. The bail application is nominated to this Court in order dated 17.09.2026 of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Saidan Ansari to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 378 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 317(4) BNS and Section 66D I.T. Act, P.S.- Bhadohi, District- Bhadohi, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been named in F.I.R. dated 06.08.2026 lodged by the police against five persons including the accused-applicant in whose bank account, the amount of cyber fraud is credited. Further contended that a person named Shahid, who is of the same village, has asked the applicant for use of his account and has paid Rs.500/- for the same. It is because of Shahid that the accused-applicant has given his account number for the transaction of Rs.99 thousand, which was returned to Shahid on account of payment of Rs.500/-. It is the accused-applicant, who is a victim in this case, as his account is used. He is illiterate and in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Nasim Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saidan Ansari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) the business of weaving of carpets. The investigation is continuing. He is cooperating in the investigation. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 07.08.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considered that the account of accused-applicant has been used by one Shahid, as is disclosed in the supplementary affidavit filed today. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 24, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 32610 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad