Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9053 (AP)

Smt.Syed Munni v. The Honourable District Judge, Kurnool

WP/25310/2011 · 2026-08-24

Ninala Jayasurya, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010605392011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25310/2011 Between: 1. SMT.SYED MUNNI, W/O.LATE SYED YOUSUF R/O.H.NO.1-34/53/2/1 COURT ROAD, SURAJ NAGAR, ATMAKUR KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE HONOURABLE DISTRICT JUDGE KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. THE HONOURABLE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE ATMAKUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioner as Sweeper illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and consequently direct the respondent to regularize the service of the petitioner as Sweeper and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 31144 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the SSR/minimum wages to the petitioner as per NJS,J & TCDS,J W.P No.25310 of 2011 2 the Proceedings of the District Collector, dated 9.9.2009 pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2011(WPMP 151133 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 6 OF 2011(WPMP 183772 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y RAMA RAO(SC FOR APHC) 2. P S P SURESH KUMAR The Court made the following: NJS,J & TCDS,J W.P No.25310 of 2011 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Writ Petition No: 25310 of 2011 ORDER: (per Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) As no arrangements were made by the petitioner to enter appearance, despite service of notice sent through the Registry, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”, vide order dated 24.08.2026. 2. Today also, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for respondents is in attendance. 4. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date:25.08.2026 Pmk NJS,J & TCDS,J W.P No.25310 of 2011 4 152 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25310 of 2011 Date: 25.08.2026 Pmk