Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9052 (AP)

GOGULA NAGARAJU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/2074/2024 · 2026-08-30

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010035512024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2074 OF 2024 Between: 1. GOGULA NAGARAJU, S/o. Gogula Ramudu, Aged about 41 years, R/o 3-59, yarraguntapalli Village, Tadipatri Mandal, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh State. 2. The Superintendent of Poiice, Anantapur District at Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh State. 3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Tadipatri Town Police Station, Ananatapur District, Andhra Pradesh State. 4. K Hanumanthaiah, Aged about 45 Years, Occupation Proprietor of Saptagiri Rice Miils, R/o Shivaiayam Backside, Yellanur Road, Tadipatri Town and Mandal, Ananatapur District ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to Issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in pressurizing the petitioner to compromise with the 4th respondent and in harassing the petitioner that he will file false cases and will beat black and blue and by repeated phone calls to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unwarranted and violation of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the 3rd Respondent not to harass the petitioner and not to interfere with his peaceful life without following due process of law and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: NERELLA S V RAVI TEJA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2074 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to work out legal remedies in the manner known to the law. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader reported no objection for the same. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to work out legal remedies in the manner known to the law. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 31.08.2026 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2074 of 2024 Date: 31.08.2026 PSA