KHALIL AHMAD AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/40450/2026 · 2026-09-22
Chawan Prakash
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9052 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9052 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40450 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
1. Heard Sri Krishna Kant Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the charge sheet No. 17 of 2020 dated 14.02.2020 as well as cognizance order dated 07.07.2020 passed by Civil Judge (S.D)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur and entire proceeding of Case No.393 of 2020 (State Vs Khalil and others), arising out of Case Crime No.07 of 2020, under sections 498-A, 323, 504 I.P.C, under section 3/4 D.P. of Act and under section 3/4 Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) 2019 police station Azeem Nagar District Rampur, pending in the court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.2 Rampur. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into a compromise and they have amicably settled their dispute outside the court and no dispute is pending between them, therefore, do not want to get adjudication of alleged criminal act and prayed that the aforesaid criminal case may be quashed. He further submits that the applicant shall file compromise deed before the learned trial court for verification. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State does not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that he has no objection, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishna Kant Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Khalil Ahmad And 7 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
if the parties approach trial court to file compromise deed in the given circumstances. 5. Whether the parties have entered into compromise, can best be adjudicated by the trial court. As such, the parties may appear before the trial court and file the compromise deed entered into between the parties within 30 days, which shall be verified by the trial court. The trial court shall place the original compromise deed in its record. 6. No compromise shall be entertained by the trial court if the informant/victim and accused are not signatories and appear before the court of its verification.
In case of exigency, the trial court shall apply its mind and pass appropriate order. 7. For a period of two months, the proceedings of the trial court shall be kept in abeyance, if the compromise is filed and verified within stipulated period, otherwise, the trial court shall continue with the trial in accordance with law. 8. All the parties, who files compromise deed and get it verified shall then file a joint application invoking inherent power of this Court to quash the criminal proceeding. 9. In view of above, the application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is accordingly disposed of. September 23, 2026 Md Faisal NA528 No. 40450 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAISAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad