Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9051 (UTT)

SARITA SAXENA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY

WPMS/2623/2018 · 2026-07-29

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010072082018 2026:UHC:6587 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2623/2018 Sarita Saxena --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand Through Secretary and others --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Mr. D.S. Mehta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 3. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 29.07.2026 Mahinder