SARITA SAXENA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY
WPMS/2623/2018 · 2026-07-29
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9051 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9051 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010072082018
2026:UHC:6587 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2623/2018
Sarita Saxena --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand Through Secretary and others --Respondent
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Mr. D.S. Mehta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
3. In view of the statement so made by
learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 29.07.2026 Mahinder