MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM ALAI v. MST SHAHNAZ GONI AND ORS (SWP/1044/2015) (PERSONAL APPERANCE 05-05-2024)
CPSW/914/2015 · 2026-04-28
Sanjay Dhar
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 905 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 905 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item No.6 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Pronounced on:28.04.2026 Uploaded on: 29.04.2026 Whether the operative part or full judgment is pronounced: Full CPSW No.914/2015 In SWP No.1044/2015 MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM ALLAI ...PETITIONER(S) Through: - None. Vs.
SHAHNAZ GONI & ORS.
…RESPONDENT(S) Through: - None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER(ORAL)
1. On 24.11.2025,
learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 had made a statement that order of this Court has been fully implemented in its letter and spirit.
Learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time to have instructions in the matter.
2. On the next date on i.e. 22.12.2025, the matter was adjourned at the joint request of learned counsel for the parties. Today the case was passed over several times but nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3. In view of the above position, there appears to be no dispute to the assertion of respondent No.4 made vide its compliance report dated 7th April, 2025 to the effect that pension of the petitioner has already been revised on
26.12.2024. Along with the said compliance report, respondent No.4 has also placed on record a copy of the revised pension payment order in respect of the petitioner.
4. In view of above, the judgment of the Writ Court stands compliance with. The contempt proceedings are closed and the contempt petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 28.04.2026
“Bhat Altaf-Secretary” Whether the Order is speaking: YES Whether the Order is reportable: YES/NO