SUBHASHREE PACKERS PVT.LTD., CUTTACK v. THE EXECTIVE ENGINEER (ELECT.), TPCODL, CUTTACK
WP(C)/8241/2026 · 2026-03-18
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9049 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9049 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8241 of 2026
Subhashree Packers Pvt. Ltd., Cuttack
….
Petitioner Mr. F.R. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
The Executive Engineer (Elect.), TPCODL, Cuttack
….
Opp. Party Mr. L.K. Maharana, Advocate for TPCODL
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 18.03.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition
with the following prayer: -
“Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court be graciously pleased to admit the writ petition, issue notice to the 0pp. Party and after providing an opportunity of being heard to the parties to the dispute;
And be pleased to quash the demand notice vide Annexure-7 in the interest of justice and equity.” p. 2p. 2
4.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that through highlighting his grievances, the petitioner has filed a representation vide Annexure-8 to the Writ Petition, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, he prays that a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted petition within a specific time period.
5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the Opposite Party No.1 to take a decision on the above noted representation in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this
order and communicate the result of such exercise to the petitioner.
5.1. Till a decision is taken as directed, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.
6. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Basudev