Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9048 (ALL)

ARJUN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WPIL/2301/2026 · 2026-09-23

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2301 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Hashim Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Suresh Singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 6 and 7. 2. The instant Public Interest Litigation has been filed specifically with a prayer that the possession of the alleged encroacher i.e. respondent no. 5 be removed from Gata No. 90 measuring 0.0570 which are Gaon Sabha land. 3. Learned counsel representing Nagar Palika Parishad and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents state that the petitioner has an efficacious alternative remedy to approach the appropriate Authority under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. Under the facts and circumstances, no interference is required by this Court. Accordingly, the instant Public Interest Litigation stands dismissed . September 24, 2026 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hashim Khan, Manvendra Kumar, Shafak Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suresh Singh (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Arjun Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad