ANUJ KUMAR SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/9264/2026 · 2026-09-22
Rajiv Lochan Shukla
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9046 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9046 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9264 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
1. After some arguments, the Learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to move a regular bail application before the concerned Court and till such time, his interest may be protected.
2. The Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the said prayer.
3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the concerned Court within a period of four weeks from today and applies for regular bail in Case Crime No.252 of 2026, under Sections 316(3), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) BNS, Police Station Kalan, District Shahjahanpur, his application for bail may be considered expeditiously, in accordance with the law, without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court, while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant.
4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant pursuant to the above-mentioned case.
5. The application stands disposed of. September 23, 2026 S.A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Anuj Kumar Singh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad