HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15346 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned Advocate has filed memo of appearance on behalf of the respondents No. 2 to 5 before the Court today, which is taken on record. Office is directed to proceed accordingly and print his name as learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India, respondent No. 1; Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondents No. 2 to 5 and perused the record on board. 3. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus the commanding/directing respondents No. 2, 3 and 4 to pay the gratuity amount of Rs.15,96,133.67/-, Privilege Leave Encashment of Rs.11,19,693.00, Provident Fund of Rs.23,02,709.35/-, LLTC Encashment of Rs.10,578/-, Medical Reimbursement of Rs.2216.60/-and arrears of salary for the month of January , 2025 of Rs.15,190/-, and for the month of February of Rs.16,480.00/-, and for the month of June, 2025 of Rs.48,530/- total arrears of Salary is Rs. 80,200.00/- and Canteen Subsidy of last month January, 2026,,.along with interest to petitioner. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding/directing respondent authorities to the decide the representation of the Petitioner dated 27.06.2026 (Annexure No.6 to this writ petition)." 4. Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for the contesting-respondents No. 2 to 5 contends that the grievance of the present petitioner raised in the instant writ petition regarding non-payment of gratuity, privileged leave encashment Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganesh Shankar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Sudarshan Singh Kamlesh Chandra Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) etc. can be more appropriately redressed by the Managing Director (respondent No. 4), and he has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 5. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Managing Director (respondent No. 4), to ventilate his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of such representation. 6. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. September 23, 2026 vinay WRIA No. 15346 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad