[2026:RJ-JP:24677] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4665/2026 URN: CRLMB / 8379U / 2026 Yogesh @ Yogi S/o Sohanlal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Alakhpura Bogan, P.s. Nechhawa, District Sikar, Raj. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka with Mr. Ashir Gauri HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 03/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.123/2025 registered at Police Station Balara, District Sikar for offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 191(2), 193(3), 190, 324(4), 111(2)(a) and 111(3) of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He argued that no specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner and that only a general and omnibus allegation has been made against him. He further submitted that the co-accused, namely, Shahrukh Khan, Naveen, and Sandeep Singh, were granted bail by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 15.09.2025, and another co-accused, [2026:RJ-JP:24677] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4665/2026] Rajneesh, was also granted bail by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 19.02.2026. The case of the present petitioner is stated to be on the same footing as that of the aforesaid co- accused. It was further contended that the petitioner has remained in judicial custody since 13.10.2025. Though seven criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner, he has been acquitted in one case, while in the remaining cases he has already been granted bail. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Yogesh @ Yogi S/o Sohanlal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 12/Arun