Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9040 (JHR)

SURESH SAO @ SURESH SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2106/2026 · 2026-05-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:13508 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2106 of 2026 Suresh Sao @ Suresh Saw, aged about 50 years, son of Jago Saw, resident of village Chutiyaro, P.O. and P.S.-Koderma, District-Koderma ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Ms. Trishna Sagar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee, Spl. P.P. 02/ 06.05.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026, registered under sections 303(2), 317(5) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, (corresponding to sections 379, 411 and 34 of I.P.C) as well as Rule- 13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017, Rules- 4/54 of JMMC Rules and 21 of MMDR Act, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner happens to be owner of one of the tractor and allegations are made of carrying 100 cft sand on the said tractor. She next submits that driver of the said vehicle has already been granted regular bail. On these grounds, she submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that petitioner is having two criminal antecedents as stated in case diary and impugned order of the learned Sessions Judge and driver of the said vehicle has been granted regular bail and in view of that anticipatory bail of the petitioner may kindly be rejected. ( 2026:JHHC:13508 ) 5. Considering that petitioner is having two criminal antecedents and driver of the said vehicle has been granted regular bail and allegations are there that in absence of proper documents sand was being carried, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.06.05.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-