1 APHC010033772026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 2339/2026 Between: 1. AMATI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. GOPAIAHA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO-11-6-9, RAGHURAM NAGAR, SATTENAPALLI TOWN AND MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT- 522403. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522503. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503. 3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN 6TH FLOOR,C BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521456. 4. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522501. 5. THE DIRECTORATE OF TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS, REP BY ITS DIRECTOR ,1ST FLOOR, NIDHI BHAVAN, BEHIND APIIC BUILDING, IT PARK MANGALAGIRI-522503. 6. PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS 2 NARASARAOPETA, PALNADU DISTRICT-522601. 7. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, NARASARAOPETA,PALNADU DISTRICT-522601. 8. THE NARASARAOPETA MUNICIPALITY, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, NARASARAOPETA,PALNADU DISTRICT-522601. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BAGGI VENKATA PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri B.V. Pavan Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, Ms. D. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance & Planning and Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.8. 2. Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.8, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Commissioner, Narasaraopet Municipality dated 16.04.2026. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The 1st paragraph of the 2nd page of the Written Instruction would indicate that the claim of the Writ Petitioner has been admitted but the same has not been paid to the Writ Petitioner on some technical reasons. 4. Having considered these reasons, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition with a direction to the Respondent Nos.2 to 6, to complete the entire administrative process, both inter-departmental and intra- departmental, by way of mutual cooperation and coordination, within a period 3 of eight (8) weeks from today and transfer the due amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within four (4) weeks thereafter. 5. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit the bank account details to the Competent Authority within four (4) weeks from today for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:17.04.2026 Vns