Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9034 (BOM)

NIKHIL BALASAHEB SATPUTE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APEAL/595/2026 · 2026-09-16

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - criappeal595.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 595 OF 2026 Nikhil s/o Balasaheb Satpute .. Appellant versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. N. T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for the Appellant. Ms. P. J. Bharad, APP for the State. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2026. PER COURT : 1. Not on board. By consent of the parties, taken on board. 2. Learned Counsel for the Appellant, on instructions, submits that during the pendency of the appeal, Appellant came to be arrested. As such, the appeal has become infructuous. 3. In view of the above, appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) dyb