Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9034 (AP)

BACHINA KALPANA v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/37267/2017 · 2026-08-30

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010848752017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 37267 OF 2017 Between: 1. BACHINA KALPANA, W/o Bollinidi Ravi Kumar, Aged 37 years, Occ Software Engineer, R/o H.No.404, Sree Towers, Bandari Layout, Road No.2, Nizampet, Ranga Reddy District. ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Administration Urban Development Department, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Block, Ground Floor, Room No.104, A.P.Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority, (CRDA), Rep.by its Commissioner, Lenin Centre, Governor Peta, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Competent Authority, Land Pooling Scheme, Unit-5, Kuragallu-2, Neerukonda village, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District. 4. Muvva Papa Rao, S/o M.Venkataramaiah, Aged about 66 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o 2-81, Uppalapadu Village, Peda Kakani Mandal, Guntur District-522509, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents 2 VS,J W.P.No.37267 of 2017 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering the four residential plots bearing Nos.1) 3-723-3609-D33, 2) 5-725- 3611-88, 3) 5-728-3631-B8 and 4) 9-723-3608-C18 and one commercial plot bearing No.31-761-3759- K21 allotted to the petitioner for acquiring the land of the petitioner in an extent of Ac.4-30 cents under the Land Pooling Scheme under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Act, 2014 and the rules made thereunder as well as communicating the Proceedings in Spl.Rc.No.233/SR-2015-DT, dated 30-10-2017, being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of principles of natural justice and consequential direct the respondent No.3 to register the four residential plots bearing Nos.1) 3-723- 3609-D33, 2) 5725-3611-138, 3) 5-728-3631-B8 and 4) 9-723-3608-C18 and one commercial plot bearing No.31-761-3759-K21 in favour of the petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 46298 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondents: GP Counsel for the Respondents: S PRANATHI Counsel for the Respondents: ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following 3 VS,J W.P.No.37267 of 2017 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner informed this Court that he submitted a letter dated 24.08.2026 before the Registry, seeking permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 31.08.2026 KGR