Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9033 (RAJ)

DILIP URF DALIP S/O SH. GAJANAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8176/2026 · 2026-07-02

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24522] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8176/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14948U / 2026 Dilip Urf Dalip S/o Sh. Gajanand, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Bagar Market, Raiwasa, Police Station Jeenmata, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 02/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.69/2026 registered at Police Station Jeenmata, District Sikar for offence under Sections 3, 25 and 25(6) of Arms Act and Section 111(4) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that one country- made pistol along with two live cartridges was recovered from his conscious possession without any valid licence or permit. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 29.04.2026. Though he has six criminal antecedents, he has been granted bail in all those cases. The charge-sheet has already [2026:RJ-JP:24522] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8176/2026] been filed. The offence is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Dilip Urf Dalip S/o Sh. Gajanand, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 52/Arun