Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9033 (ORI)

PARBATI MOHARANA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/9615/2026 · 2026-04-09

Ananda Chandra Behera

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.9615 of 2026 Parbati Moharana ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. - Mr.Biswajit Nayak -versus- State of Orissa & others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr. S.R. Pattnaik, AGA WP(C) No.9635 of 2026 Braja Kishore Moharana ..... Appellant Represented by Adv. - Mr.Biswajit Nayak -versus- State of Orissa & others ..... Respondents Represented by Adv. – Mr. S.R. Pattnaik, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA ORDER 22.04.2026 Order No. 02. I.A. Nos.7208 of 2026 & 7209 of 2026 1. These matters are taken up through hybrid mode. 2. These I.As have arisen out of WP(C) Nos.9615 of 2026 and 9635 of 2026 for proper and effective implementation of the order passed on dated 09.04.2026 in WP(C) Nos.9615 of 2026 and 9635 of 2026. 3. The Petitioners have filed these I.As for some corrections in order to direct the Opposite Party No.1 (State of Odisha) instead of Opposite Parties 2 and 3 (Collector, Cuttack and Civil Supplies Page 2 of 3. Officer, Cuttack) to extend the period of their token in purchasing the amount of paddy indicated in their respective tokens. 4. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State. 5. When the Petitioners have filed these I.As for proper and effective implementation of the order passed on dated 09.04.2026 in WP(C) Nos.9615 of 2026 and 9635 of 2026 by the Opposite Party No.1 (State of Odisha) by taking decision in respect of the same without making any prayer for changing other portion of the said order, then, I find no justification to disallow these I.As filed on behalf of the Petitioners. 6. Hence, these I.As filed by the Petitioners are allowed. 7. In Para-7 of the order on dated 09.04.2026 passed in WP(C) Nos.9615 of 2026 and 9635 of 2026, necessary corrections shall be made directing the Opposite Party No.1 (State of Odisha) to extend the period of the token of the Petitioners for purchasing the amount of paddy indicated in the respective tokens without causing any inconvenience and harassment to them (Petitioners) in any manner and shall take decision in respect of the same on the very day of production of the certified copy of this corrected order along with the earlier order dated 09.04.2026 passed in WP(C) Nos.9615 of 2026 and 9635 of 2026 after excluding the last portions of that Para No.7. 8. As such, these I.As are disposed of finally. ( ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) Judge Page 3 of 3. 03. WP(C) Nos.9615 of 2026 & 9635 of 2026 1. In view of the order passed today in I.A Nos.7208 of 2026 and 7209 of 2026, the corrections allowed in the above two I.As are carried out in Order No.01 on dated 09.04.2026 passed in WP(C) Nos.9615 of 2026 and 9635 of 2026 in presence of the learned counsels for both the sides. ( ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) Judge Pradeep