Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9033 (KAR)

MAMATHA v. KANTHAMMA T A

CRL.RP/1035/2022 · 2026-03-18

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15794 CRL.RP No. 1035 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1035 OF 2022 BETWEEN: MAMATHA, W/O BYTARAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, KARNATAKA SANGA ROAD, R/A NO.6TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, JALAHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE - 560 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANOJ G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI KUMARA K G., ADVOCATE) AND: KANTHAMMA T A., W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/A NO.527, 2ND CROSS, 83, 19TH MAIN, BHAVUBALI NAGAR JALAHALLI POST, BANGALORE - 560 061. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI ANAND R.B., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT THE PETITIONER HAS PREFERRED APPEAL BEFORE THE HONBLE LX Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15794 CRL.RP No. 1035 of 2022 ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU HAS PASSED THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A.NO.93/2020 DATED 13.04.2022 AND JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HONBLE XXII A.C.M.M., BENGALURU I C.C.NO.26952/2017 DATED 13.12.2019 TO ACQUIT THE PETITIONER OF THE CHARGE UNDER SEC.138 OF THE N.I ACT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the argument for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo and it reads as under: "Memo The Advocate for petitioner filed this memo stating the that the petitioner is ready to pay the 1,50,000/- in 3 installments (3 months), Hence this memo may to be take on record & pass necessary order in the interest of Justice & equity." 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed no objection on the memo. 3. Placing the memo on record, the revision petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that if the compensation amount as agreed in the memo is not paid, the petitioner shall undergo - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15794 CRL.RP No. 1035 of 2022 imprisonment as ordered by learned Trial Magistrate and confirmed by learned judge of first appellate Court. Amount in deposit, if any, is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant on due identification. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26