Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9025 (ALL)

SAHINA PARVEEN AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/38409/2026 · 2026-09-22

Kshitij Shailendra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38409 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Prayer for expeditious disposal of Restoration Application No.6571 of 2026 (Computerized Case No. RST-202616670506571) (Kamar Jahan v. Abdul Raseed) has been made. 2.A perusal of order sheet of the said case indicates that two dates were fixed and on both the dates, counsel had remained on strike. 3. Be that as it may, adjudication of restoration application cannot be lingered on indefinitely. 4. The petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid restoration application on merits within a period of two months from the date a copy of this order is produced before it. 5. In case the lawyers remain on strike during this period, the officer shall permit personal appearance of any of the three petitioners and shall decide the case after hearing her on merits, as directed. September 23, 2026 Jyotsana Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Dutt Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) Sahina Parveen and 2 others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTSANA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad