[2026:RJ-JP:24008] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 9821/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18171U / 2026 Suresh Kashyap S/o Shri Ghasilal Kashyap, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Keeron Ka Mohalla, Chhawni, Police Station Sadar, District Tonk. (Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody At Central Jail Jaipur). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Mathur with Mr. Ankur Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. Ms. Anamika Bishnoi for the complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 30/06/2026 1. The present second bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 16.06.2026, passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, in CIS No.1077/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.136/2026 registered at Police Station-Pratap Nagar (Jaipur City-East), District-Jaipur, for the offences under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 126(2), 109(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that [2026:RJ-JP:24008] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9821/2026] the parties have entered into compromise and main accused Hanuman Mehra has already been enlarged on bail by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.05.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.4719/2026. He further submits that the learned Trial Court has merely rejected the bail application on account of the fact that on the basis of compromise, they have no jurisdiction to allow the bail application. He further submits that the charge-sheet (challan) has already been filed, and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, Ms. Anamika Bishnoi, learned counsel for the complainant submits and admits the fact that the parties have entered into compromise. She also submits that co-accused Hanuman Mehra has already been enlarged on bail by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court. She also has no objection if the bail application of the present petitioner is allowed. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the second bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and having regard to the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as well as the fact that co-accused Hanuman Mehra has already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, parties have entered into compromise, the charge-sheet (challan) has already been filed, and learned counsel appearing for [2026:RJ-JP:24008] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9821/2026] the complainant/victim has no objection if the bail is granted to the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the present second bail application deserves to be allowed. 7. Consequently, the present second bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely-Suresh Kashyap S/o Shri Ghasilal Kashyap arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.136/2026 registered at Police Station-Pratap Nagar (Jaipur City-East), District-Jaipur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/ (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial. (BIPIN GUPTA), J Sudha/106