Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9023 (CHH)

SORAN SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2555/2020 · 2026-03-16

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:12634 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2555 of 2020 Soran Singh S/o Shri Phooli Singh Aged About 27 Years R/o 17th Battalion, Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh, Armed Force (C.A.F.) (I/r) District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home/police, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, P.S. And P.O.- Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Inspector General Of Police (I.G.P.) Office Of Inspector General Of Police (I.G.P.) Chhattisgarh Armed Force (C.A.F.) Durg Zone, Police Headquarter (P.H.Q.), P.S. And P.O.- Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Disrict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Commandant 17th Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Force (C.A.F.), Kabirdham, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : None in two rounds For Respondent-State : Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 17.03.2026 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has only sought a direction to the respondent No.02 to decide his pending appeal/representation within a reasonable time. 2. Be that as it may, the respondent No.02 is directed to decide SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 petitioner’s said appeal/representation within a period of 45 days’ from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order by passing a reasoned and speaking order, if not already decided. 3. With aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. s@if sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge