SMT. SUFIYA @ ELIZEBETH MARRY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/13691/2025 · 2026-02-20
M Nagaprasanna
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 902 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 902 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10790 CRL.P No. 13691 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13691 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SUFIYA @ ELIZEBETH MARRY W/O LATE PRATAP AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS R/A # 887, 2ND MAIN, 5TH CROSS S NIJALINGAPPA LAYOUT DAVANAGERE 577002
2.
SMT MARIA FELESTINA D/O MANUVAL DEVID AGE ABOUT 27 YEARS R/A ANTONY CHURCH RAILWAY STATION ROAD SOMESHWARAPURAM TUMAKURU 572102 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENKATESH S.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VIDYANAGAR POLLICE STATIONDAVANAGERE REPT BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OFKARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BENGALURU
Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10790 CRL.P No. 13691 of 2025
2.
SMT PALLAVI T W/O LATE PRATHAP B AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS EMPLOYEE AT PRIVATE FIRM
3.
SRI LIKLHITH S/OPALLAVI T AGE ABOUT 19 YEARS CMPLOYEE AT PRIVATE COMPANY
R.2 AND 3 R/A SHREE RAGHAVENDRA NILAIYA D/NO 40005/67,10TH CROSS MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT SHIVAGANGA CONCENTION HALL BACK SIDE DAVANGERE
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1)
CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH FIR NO.203/2025 DATED 12.09.2025 REGISTERED AT VIDYANAGAR P.S. DAVANAGERE AGAINST THE PETITIONERS SECTIOIN 3(1),(r), 3(2) (V-a) SC/ST ACT AND UNDER SECTION 329(4), 352, 351 (3), 351(2) OF BNS AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10790 CRL.P No. 13691 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The advocate for the petitioners submitted that, the respondent-Vidyanagara Police filed a charge sheet, hence this petition is not maintainable. hence the petitioner seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioners to withdraw the petition, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Liberty so sought is granted.
3. In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 83