SHRI DINESH KUMAR SAINI S/O SHRI MATTULAL SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8129/2026 · 2026-07-01
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9017 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9017 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8129/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14857U / 2026 Shri Dinesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Mattulal Saini, aged about 34 Years, R/o Aagar Ki Dhani, Village Panchayat Gadhmora, Tehsil Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.) the then Senior Assistant Reader, Sub-Division Office, Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Bhanwar Singh Chouhan Mr.Saurabh Pratap Singh Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr.Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr.Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 01/07/2026
1. The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No.103/2026, registered at the Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, District ACB District, for the offence punishable under Sections 7 & 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 61(2) of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the allegation of demand of bribe is against the petitioner, but there is no recovery at the instance of the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2026 and after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted. Counsel further submits that the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-8129/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2026 and after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted and the trial will take its own time to conclude, hence, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS.
6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Shri Dinesh Kumar Saini S/o Shri Mattulal Saini, arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/2