05.03.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.21 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. C.R.M. (SB) 98 of 2024 Ritu Bhimsaria versus State of West Bengal & Anr. In Re: An Application for cancellation of bail under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and/or Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Mr. Anirban Dutta, Mr. Shivam Bhimsaria … For the Petitioner. Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee, Mr. M.F.A. Begg … For the State. Mr. Navanil De, Mr. Subhrajit Dey … For the Opposite Party No.2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that on the first day of production, the opposite party no.2 herein was granted bail. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that there was earlier direction passed by this Court on 24.10.2025. A report was submitted by the State which did not contain the report of FSL, Belgachia. Learned advocate appearing for the opposite party no.2 denies the accusations. I have taken into account the tenor of the accusations as well as the relationship between the parties. The petitioner and the opposite party no.2 are related to each other and are staying within the same flat. There are series of cases already pending between the parties. I have also taken into account the facts of the case, the issues which 2 weighed with the learned Magistrate while granting bail and I am of the opinion that the order of bail having been granted on 08.05.2024, at this belated stage almost after 1 year 10 months do not call for any interference. However, if the investigating agency requires the presence of the accused/opposite party no.2 herein and is of the opinion that his presence would create breach of the peace in and around the premises in question, appropriate application may be filed before the learned Magistrate. Learned Magistrate would give audience to the accused/opposite party no.2 herein and thereafter dispose of the same in accordance with law. Needless to state that if the petitioner also faces inconvenience, in such circumstances she would be at liberty to take out similar application before the learned Magistrate. With the aforesaid observations, the application for cancellation of bail being CRM (SB) 98 of 2024 is disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)