RAJESH @ RAJU S/O SHRI MADAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/697/2026 · 2026-07-02
Praveer Bhatnagar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9012 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9012 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:24373] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 697/2026 URN: CRLMB / 1192U / 2026 Rajesh @ Raju S/o Shri Madan Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Talwa Piplya, Police Station Narayangarh, District Mandsor, Madhya Pradesh. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Saroj Kumar Trivedi Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 02/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 491/2025 registered at Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli Behror for the offences under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated for the offence under Section 8/15 read with Section 8/29 of NDPS Act. It is further contended that recovery of contraband article i.e. commercial quantity of poppy straw weighing 113 kg 44 grams was effected from co-accused namely Sukhveer and Gurjant and apart from the disclosure statement of the co-accused there is no substantial evidence available on record to show that petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:24373] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-697/2026] was involved in supplying of the said contraband articles. The petitioner is behind the bars since 08.11.2025 and charge-sheet has already been filed and further trial of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that further trial of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Rajesh @ Raju S/o Shri Madan Lal in connection with FIR No. 491/2025 registered at Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli Behror shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Chetna/9