- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9430 WP No. 29540 of 2025 C/W WP No. 22504 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 29540 OF 2025 (GM-FC) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 22504 OF 2025 (GM-FC) IN WP No. 29540/2025 BETWEEN: MR. RAMESH MV AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, S/O B.M. VASANTH KUMAR R/AT NO.23, 4TH CROSS ROAD, 1ST MAIN ROAD, VINAYAKA NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 030 MOB- +91 9035646244 E-MAIL: perfectwork36 gmail.com …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH H, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: MRS. NANDINI G AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, W/O MR. RAMESH M.V R/AT 27, 7TH CROSS ROAD, WILSON GARDEN, BANGALORE - 560 027 MOB: +91 9740472965 E- MAIL: itsmenandini7 gmail.com …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ANAND M. SHOLAPURMATH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9430 WP No. 29540 of 2025 C/W WP No. 22504 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN MC NO. 4032/2025 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HOWBLE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BANGALORE AND ETC., IN WP NO. 22504/2025 BETWEEN: SMT. NANDINI G W/O RAMESH M.V, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.27, 7TH CROSS ROAD WILSON GARDEN, BANGALORE - 560 027. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANAND M. SHOLAPURMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. RAMESH M.V, S/O B.M. VASANTH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.23, 4TH CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR AUDGODI POST, BANGALORE - 560 030. ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH H, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21.07.2025 PASSED BY THE HONORABLE III ADDITIONAL FAMILY JUDGE AT BENGALURU, IN IA NO. 4 IN MC NO. 4032/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE -J AND ETC., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9430 WP No. 29540 of 2025 C/W WP No. 22504 of 2025 THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER Sri.Anand M Sholapurmath learned counsel for the petitioner in WP No.22504/2025 submits that both the writ petitions have become infructuous. 2. Record discloses justification in the submission thus made. 3. Meticulous perusal of record as earlier indicated reveals that both the writ petitions have become infructuous. Nothing survives for consideration. Hence both the writ petitions are dismissed. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18