Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9007 (PNJ)

VIMAL v. UT OF CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/64505/2025 · 2026-01-23

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH         Date of decision: 23rd January, 2026 Vimal ...Petitioner Versus U.T., Chandigarh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. A.P. Kaushal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Bansal, P.P., U.T., Chandigarh with Ms. Diksha Sharma, Advocate for U.T., Chandigarh. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):-                                    Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Since the main case has already been disposed of, pending application if any is rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 23rd January, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No         PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.01.23 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document