Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9007 (ALL)

KRIPA SHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS

WRIB/4229/2026 · 2026-09-22

Arun Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4229 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide Revision No. 16 of 2025 within a specific period as fixed by this Court. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the revision filed by the petitioner is pending before the respondent no. 2 for more than a year. Contention is that in view of the provisions contained in Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the revision itself ought to have been decided within six months from the date of its filing, however, till date it is pending. Submission is that the matter is being routinely adjourned without any justifiable reasons. 4. Having considered the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and the considering the facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the aforementioned revision, in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. September 23, 2026 Ashok Kr. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pradeep Singh (Arun Kumar,J.) Kripa Shankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 14 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad