RAVI BOYAT @ GOLU CHADDA S/O RAMESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9519/2026 · 2026-07-02
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9005 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9005 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:24608] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9519/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17654U / 2026 Ravi Boyat @ Golu Chadda S/o Ramesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Behind Sabjimandi, Harijan Basti, Bundi, Ps Kotwali, District Bundi, (Raj) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi, District Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 02/07/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.7/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi for offences under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioner is limited to the theft of five air conditioners from the Bank premises. It is also submitted that the co-accused, Shabbeer, has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 01.04.2026, despite having eight criminal
[2026:RJ-JP:24608] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9519/2026] antecedents. The case of the present petitioner stands on a better footing, as the petitioner has only two criminal antecedents and has been in judicial custody since 02.02.2026. Charge-sheet has been filed. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ravi Boyat @ Golu Chadda S/o Ramesh, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 82/Arun