1 937 CA 10623 OF 2026 to 942, 945, 948, 949 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10623 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19712/2026 BAPURAO TUKARAM MULKE. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THR., THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14763 OF 2019 IN FAST/13522/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14764 OF 2019 IN FAST/13522/2019 AND 938 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10625 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19736/2026 BALAJI ALBA MULKE DIED THR LRS VYANKATRAO AND ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THR., THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14774 OF 2019 IN FAST/13549/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14773 OF 2019 IN FAST/13549/2019 AND 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10627 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19760/2026 VISHWANATH KONDIBA GOJEWAD DIED THR L.RS. BHAGIRATH VISHWANATH GOJEWAD AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THR., THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. WITH 2026:BHC-AUG:42289 2 937 CA 10623 OF 2026 to 942, 945, 948, 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14768 OF 2019 IN FAST/13540/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14767 OF 2019 IN FAST/13540/2019 AND 940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10630 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19755/2026 GANPAT TUKARAM MULKE AND ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THR., THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14765 OF 2019 IN FAST/13555/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14766 OF 2019 IN FAST/13555/2019 AND 941 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10632 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19715/2026 VYANKTRAO BALAJI MULKE AND ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ORS. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14771 OF 2019 IN FAST/13544/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14772 OF 2019 IN FAST/13544/2019 AND 942 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10633 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19762/2026 SOPAN TUKARAM GOJEWAD AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THR., THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. 3 937 CA 10623 OF 2026 to 942, 945, 948, 949 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14770 OF 2019 IN FAST/13537/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14769 OF 2019 IN FAST/13537/2019 AND 945 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10639 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19697/2026 BALAJI ATMARAM MULKE DIED THR L.RS. PARMESHWAR BALJAI MULKE AND ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THR., THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14759 OF 2019 IN FAST/13531/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14760 OF 2019 IN FAST/13531/2019 AND 948 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10664 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19746/2026 NANDU RAMRAO NILEWAD. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA THR., THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ORS. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14757 OF 2019 IN FAST/13261/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14758 OF 2019 IN FAST/13261/2019 AND 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10665 OF 2026 IN X-OBJST/19703/2026 HULAPPA PIRAJI BONGALE. VERSUS 4 937 CA 10623 OF 2026 to 942, 945, 948, 949 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ORS. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14761 OF 2019 IN FAST/13559/2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14762 OF 2019 IN FAST/13559/2019 ... Mr. S. R. Bagal, Advocate for Applicants/claimants in all matters Mr. R. K. Ingole, Mr. A. V. Lavte, Mr. B. V. Virdhe, Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, Mr. K. B. Jadhavar and Mr. S. N. Kendre, AGPs for Respondent-State respectively … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATED : 11th September 2026 P.C. :- CIVIL APPLICATIONS FOR RESTORATION . Mr. S. R. Bagal, learned Advocate for the applicants/claimants submits that the registration of the cross- objections was refused on account of failure of the applicants to remove office objections within the stipulated time. The present applications are filed seeking restoration of the cross- objections by setting aside the said order of dismissal. 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. The delay, if any, caused in filing the cross-objections stands condoned. The order passed by the learned Registrar 5 937 CA 10623 OF 2026 to 942, 945, 948, 949 (Judicial) of this Court is hereby quashed and set aside. 3. The cross-objections are restored to their original position, provided that the applicants shall remove all office objections within a period of four weeks from today. 4. It is made clear that if the office objections are not removed within the stipulated period, this order shall automatically lose its effect. 5. It is clarified that if the cross-objections are allowed, the applicants shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) PRW