Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9000 (BOM)

SHEETAL RISHI DARDA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS

RA/191/2026 · 2026-09-10

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) 904-922 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 904 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 174 OF 2026 IN WP/3858/2023 Sangita Manoj Bhandari VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 905 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 175 OF 2026 IN WP/7440/2022 Ruchira Karan Darda VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 906 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 176 OF 2026 IN WP/3853/2023 Anil Hiralal Bhandari VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 907 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 177 OF 2026 IN WP/7441/2022 Ashoo Rajendra Darda VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 908 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 178 OF 2026 IN WP/3857/2023 Ratnamala Hiralal Bhandari ( 2 ) 904-922 VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 909 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 179 OF 2026 IN WP/7443/2022 Karan Rajendra Darda VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 910 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 180 OF 2026 IN WP/4775/2022 Varsha Surendra Petty VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 911 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 181 OF 2026 IN WP/4778/2022 Jitendra Shantilal Petty VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 912 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 182 OF 2026 IN WP/4772/2022 Rachna Jitendra Petty VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 913 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 183 OF 2026 IN WP/4786/2022 Pankaj Ratilal Mugadiya ( 3 ) 904-922 VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 914 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 184 OF 2026 IN WP/4776/2022 Ravindra Shantilal Petty VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 915 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 185 OF 2026 IN WP/3856/2023 Poonam Anil Bhandari VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 916 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 186 OF 2026 IN WP/4777/2022 Surendra Shantilal Petty VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others AND 917 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 187 OF 2026 IN WP/4769/2022 Ravindra Ramanlal Mugadiya VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 918 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 188 OF 2026 IN WP/3855/2023 ( 4 ) 904-922 Manoj Hiralal Bhandari VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 919 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 189 OF 2026 IN WP/3854/2023 Hiralal Chandmalji Bhandari VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 920 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 190 OF 2026 IN WP/4840/2022 Namrata Ravindra Petty VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others AND 921 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 191 OF 2026 IN WP/7439/2022 Sheetal Rishi Darda VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development and Ors. AND 922 REVIEW APPLICATION (CIVIL) NO. 192 OF 2026 IN WP/7442/2022 Rishi Rajendra Darda VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Through Department Of Urban Development And Others ….. ( 5 ) 904-922 Mr. S. S. Khoche h/f Mr. D. P. Palodkar, Advocates for Applicant. Mr. K. N. Lokhande, Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, Mr. P. B. Pulkundwar, AGPs for Respondent/State. Mr. Chetan Kapadia, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. A. A. Yadkikar and Mr. S. S. Jawale, Mr. A. D. Kulkarni i/by DSK Legal, Advocates for Respondents. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER 2026. PC :- 1. Learned Advocate for the Applicants in all these applications, on instructions and on the basis of withdrawal pursis filed on the last occasion, seeks leave to withdraw these applications. 2. Leave granted as prayed for. 3. Review Applications stand disposed off as withdrawn. 4. In view of disposal of Review Applications, pending civil application if any, also stand disposed off. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] D.A.ETHAPE