SHAKEER @ BACCHA S/O YUSUF KHAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5877/2026 · 2026-06-30
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8995 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8995 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:24056] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 5877/2026 URN: CRLMB / 10525U / 2026 Shakeer @ Baccha S/o Yusuf Khan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o House No. C-815, Bhatta Basti, Madina, Hotel Ke Neche, Kachchi Basti, Police Station Bhatta Basti, Jaipur At Present R/o B 212 Sanjay Nagar, Bhatta Basti, Jaipur. (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN (Through Video Conferencing)
Order 30/06/2026
1. The present third bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Shakeer @ Baccha S/o Yusuf Khan seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.93/2025 dated 15.04.2025 registered at Police Station Vidhayakpuri, District Jaipur City (South), for the offence under Sections 304(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with trial, which will take time.
[2026:RJ-JP:24056] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5877/2026]
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant-accused has submitted that the first bail application of present applicant was dismissed on 11.08.2025 and second on 24.11.2025. He also submitted that the present applicant-accused is in custody since his arrest on 15.04.2025 and till date, the trial has not concluded. He also submitted that the offence is triable by Magistrate First Class and keeping behind bars would serve no purpose. He also submitted that other co-accused Shoyab Khan @ Attack was already released on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court on 03.11.2025. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On basis of a report dated 15.04.2026 about snatching by two unknown persons, FIR No.93/2025 under Section 304(2) of BNS, 2023 was registered at Police Station Vidhayakpuri, District Jaipur City (South). After investigation, police has identified present applicant-accused and Shoyab Khan @ Attack and filed a charge-sheet against both of them. Present applicant-accused is in custody since his arrest on
15.04.2025. First bail application was dismissed by this Court on 11.08.2025 and second on 24.11.2025. 7. The material on record indicate that 3 witnesses were examined till 06.05.2026 by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.16, Jaipur Metropolitan-I. The report
[2026:RJ-JP:24056] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5877/2026] submitted by police indicate that 31 criminal cases were registered against the applicant and in all cases, charge- sheet has been filed. Co-accused Shoyab Khan @ Attack was released on bail by a Coordinate Bench on 03.11.2025 as 8 criminal cases were registered against him. 8. No doubt about the fact that the present applicant is in custody for last more than 15 months and the trial has not concluded. It is duty of the trial Court to ensure that the trial is concluded within a reasonable and specified time. Considering the judgment in case of State of Karnataka v. Sri Darshan Etc. (2025 INSC 979), I am of considered view that where there is large number of criminal cases registered against any person, then considering the criminal background, he is not entitled to bail. 9.
In view of discussion made herein above and considering the criminal background of the applicant-accused, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail only on the ground that he is in custody for last 15 months. 10. Considering the gravity of allegations and overall facts and circumstances of the case, it is appropriate to dismiss the third bail application of the applicant accused at this stage. 11. Accordingly, the third application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by Shakeer @ Baccha S/o Yusuf Khan is hereby dismissed. 12. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J 2/Gkaviya