UKHC010012092020 2026:UHC:6425 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/185/2020 Manpreet Kaur --Petitioner Versus Union of India and another --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Ravi Bisht, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Shaurya Mehra, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Akhil Kumar Sah, Advocate for the respondent. 2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief: “Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide and pass speaking and reasoned order in regard to the subsidy to be granted to the petitioner herein for the commercial cultivation of tomato under poly house.” 3. Mr. Ravi Bisht, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of writ petition, decision has been taken by the competent authority. Thus, he submits that writ petition has now become infructuous. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 27.07.2026 Mahinder UKHC010012092020 2026:UHC:6425