1 2026:CGHC:4449 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 10254 of 2025 Resham Dheemar @ Bholu @ Golu (Resham Lal Jalchhatri) S/o Kaushal Kishore Dheemar (Jalchhatri), aged about 28 Years R/o Ward No. 06, Matkhanwa Para, Urla, Acholi-2, P.S. Urla, Raipur, Tehsil and District Raipur C.G. ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh through the Police Station- Khamtarai, District Raipur C.G. ... Respondent For the applicant : Mr. Anil Tripathi, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sunita Manikpuri, Dy. Govt. Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Order on Board 27.01.2026 1. This is first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant in Crime No. Sessions Case 236/2025 registered at Police Station Khamtarai, District Raipur (CG) for the offences under Sections 103(1) of BNS. 2. As per the prosecution case, on 22.3.2025 the applicant was selling vegetables and at that time deceased Kamakhya aged about 50 years old came to his stall to purchase vegetables and bargained with the applicant. On such bargaining, the applicant had not only threatened to kill him by abusing him, but also assaulted him with ALLENA ANNAJEE RAO Digitally signed by ALLENA ANNAJEE RAO Date: 2026.01.28 18:15:51 +0530 2 hands and fists, threw him on the ground, pressed his neck and inflicted injuries on the head, thereby the deceased has died. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there was no intention to kill the accused and the applicant did not cause the incident. He submits that during trial one witness Smt. Heera Bai Sahu (P.W.1) has been examined and she has not supported the prosecution case, therefore, he has been falsely implicated. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 25.03.2025; till date out of a total 18 witnesses, only 1 has been examined and there is no immediate possibility of disposal of case, therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on bail. 4. Per contra, learned State Counsel opposes the bail application and submits that there are 3 eye-witnesses to the incident and the applicant has caused the incident. 5. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to release him on regular bail at this stage. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. 6. However, looking to the custody period of the applicant, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial as early as possible preferably within a period of 5 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 7. Copy of this order be sent to the trial Court for information. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Rao