RAVIKUMAR GOPICHAND JHAMNANI v. SYED KASAM BUDHAN DIED THROUGH LRS SYED HAMID SYED KASAM AND OTHERS
CA/4776/2026 · 2026-09-11
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8994 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8994 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
914 CA 4776 26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4776 OF 2026 IN WP/5703/2025 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5703 OF 2025 RAVIKUMAR GOPICHAND JHAMNANI VERSUS SYED KASAM BUDHAN DIED THROUGH LRS SYED HAMID SYED KASAM AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Dr. Nandedkar Sahebrao G. Advocate for Respondent nos. 1A to 1F and 2 : Mr. Shaikh Naseer ... CORAM : SMT. MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 11.09.2026 PER COURT :
This application has been filed by the applicant seeking recall of the conditional order passed by this Court on 25.03.2026.
2. The learned Advocate for the applicant submits that, by the said conditional order, the petitioner was directed to take necessary steps, failing which the matter was liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution. It is submitted that, despite due diligence, the applicant could not remove the office objection regarding furnishing the current address of respondent No.3, and consequently, the writ petition came to be dismissed. It is further submitted that the applicant is now in a position to furnish the fresh and correct address of respondent No.3. The learned Advocate, therefore, prays that the order dated 25.03.2026 be recalled and the writ petition be restored to its original file. 1/2 2026:BHC-AUG:42364
914 CA 4776 26.odt
3. In view of the submissions made by the learned Advocate for the applicant and for the reasons stated in the application, the conditional order passed by this Court on 25.03.2026 is hereby recalled. The writ petition is restored to its original file.
4. Civil Application is disposed of.
5. Issue fresh notice to respondent no. 3 in writ petition, returnable on
28.09.2026.
6. In addition to the regular mode of service, the petitioner is at liberty to serve the respondent no. 3 by private mode.
( SMT. MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE, J.)
mkd/- 2/2