Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8992 (RAJ)

NAINA S/O MANGILAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7696/2026 · 2026-06-30

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23816] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7696/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14018U / 2026 Naina S/o Mangilal, Aged About 67 Years, R/o Bhogipura, Police Station Mrigwas, Distt. Guna, Madhya Pradesh. (Petitioner In Sub Jail Chhabara). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Drishti Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 30/06/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 55/2026 registered at Police Station Harnavda Shahji, District Baran for offence under Sections 8 and 18 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that contraband article, i.e., Opium plants recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner does not fall within the ambit of commercial quantity and the allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he was found to be cultivating the Opium plant without having any valid licence. There are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long, charge-sheet [2026:RJ-JP:23816] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7696/2026] has already been filed and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that petitioner is in custody since long and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Naina S/o Mangilal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bail bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each of the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J 14/PARSHANT