Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8992 (GAU)

HANNAN ALI v. THE ICICI BANK AND OTHRS

WP(C)/3310/2026 · 2026-06-23

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010118842026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3310/2026 HANNAN ALI S/O ABUL KASHEM,R/O-Ward No.4, AMBARI,P.O AND P.S- Howly, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781316. VERSUS THE ICICI BANK AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT ICICI BANK TOWERS, BANDRAKURLA COMPLEX, MUMBAI-400051 2:THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER SURVEILLANCE INVESTIGATIONDEPARTMENT ICICI BANK ICICI BANKTOWERS BANDRA-KURLA COMPLEX BKC G BLOCK MUMBAI-400051. 3:THE ZONAL MANAGER ICICI BANK ZONALOFFICE OHIO SHOPPING COMPLEX 1SRFLOOR MG ROAD FANCY BAZAR GUWAHATI-781001. 4:THE BRANCH MANAGER ICICI BANK Page No.# 2/2 BARPETA BRANCH KESHAB KRISHNAMART BB ROAD BARPETA TOWN P.O P.S DIST-BARPETA ASSAM. PIN-781301 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M ALI, H R KHAN,MR. J UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, I C I C I BANK, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 24.06.2026 Heard Mr. M. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel for all the respondents. Mr. Ali has submitted that after filing of the writ petition, the issue raised in the writ petition has been resolved and in that view of the matter, the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. In view of the above submission of Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant